- The criteria for atypia in Spitz nevi are not well agreed upon.
- Proposed criteria are divided into those applying to the intraepidermal component and those applying to the dermal component. These are enumerated below, with the most essential criteria in bold.
- Intraepidermal component:
- Large size (>1 cm)
- Asymmetry
- Ulceration
- Lateral extension of the intrepidermal component ("shoulder phenomenon")
- Disordered architecture:
- Lentiginous or single-cell pattern
- Variation in the size, shape, orientation, spacing or cohesion of nests
- Pagetoid spread
- Poor circumscription
- Cytologic atypia beyond that which is typical for a Spitz nevus:
- Pleomorphism
- Variation in chromatin pattern
- Nucleomegaly
- Variation in nucleoli
- Host response:
- Patchy to band-like upper dermal mononuclear infiltrates
- Fibroplasia
- Dermal component:
- Disordered architecture:
- Increased cellularity
- Cohesive, expansive cellular nodules
- Asymmetry
- Extension into the lower dermis or subcutis
- Lack of maturation or orderly infiltration of collagen
- Ulceration
- Necrosis
- Cytologic atypia:
- Pleomorphism
- Variation in chromatin pattern
- Nucleomegaly
- Variation in nucleoli
- Mitotic activity, especially in the deeper aspect of the lesion and the presence of atypical mitoses
- Host response:
- Prominent mononuclear infiltrates
- Formation of tumor stroma
- Many of these criteria are quite subjective, in particular cytologic atypia, and a diagnosis of atypia or malignancy should be taken with great care, evaluating all of the features as a whole.
- The threshold for a diagnosis of malignancy should be lowered in an older patient, especially one over the age of 30, and if the lesion presents on a location that is unusual for a Spitz nevus, such as the back.
- In many cases malignancy or benignity cannot be definitively diagnosed with confidence, and if this is the case it should be clearly communicated to the clinician.