I do not use the term lentigo maligna in my practice at all.
19% (26 votes)
I consider lentigo maligna a distinct more indolent form of melanoma in situ on severely sun exposed skin.
74% (102 votes)
I use term lentigo maligna for all melanomas on severely sun damaged skin and do not further subtype..
7% (10 votes)
Total votes: 138
Comments
Lentigo Maligna
I find this term causes much confusion. As a result I use the term 'in situ melanoma' and lentigo maligna in brackets after it. Personally, I think this term should be abandoned.
Lentigo maligna
I use the term "lentigo maligna melanoma in situ" instead of "lentigo maligna" to avoid confusion. I believe LMM in situ is simply an in situ melanoma, usually in sun damaged skin with a distinctive radial growth pattern.
This is my approach as well.
This is my approach as well.
I use the same approach.
I use the same approach.
I agree with the above
I agree with the above statement. I avoid the term lentigo maligna and use the term in-situ melanoma instead.
If it appears as choice #2,
If it appears as choice #2, I use "Melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna-type"
Lentiginous melanoma in radial growth phase
Lentigo maligna is a form of lentiginous melanoma. This term is antiquated and inaccurate but it is well known and well understood by most. To decrease the likelyhood of mistakes, I continue to use it in parentheses.
For cases that fit all clinical and pathological criteria for lentigo maligna, I sign them as "lentiginous melanoma in radial growth phase (lentigo maligna)". I also add "No evidence of vertical growth phase (no lentigo maligna melanoma)".
LM
I use malignant melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type - features: severely sun damaged skin, minimal to no upward migration, excessive spreading single melanocytes, poor - random nesting, adnexal involvement.